Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 06:57

Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why is the Middle East prone to terrorism?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What are some ways to determine if a project is legitimate in the call center industry?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Dietitians say: If you want to lose weight, eat dessert - Business Insider
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Massive Solar Storm Sparks Rare G4 Alert: What It Means for Earth - SciTechDaily
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Former MLB Star Suffers Serious Injury in Savannah Bananas Game - Sports Illustrated
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Will Boyington – New AA NASA Office Of Communications - NASA Watch
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All flights grounded at Newark Airport due to staffing issues - FOX 5 New York